Duty to Accommodate

 Menu - Jump To:

 

Duty to Accommodate

  • The right  to accommodation in employment is premised on assuring persons with disabilities with work capacity are not unfairly excluded from employment.  Employees with disabilities are to be accommodated up to undue hardship. Accommodation law has established obligations on employers, unions and employees in the accommodation process and has established  certain limitations to the employers duty to accommodate.

Case Law

  • Eldridge v British Columbia (Attorney General), [1997] 2 SCR 624
  • R v Big M Drug Mart Ltd, [1985] 1 SCR 295
  • Lane v ADGA Group Consultants Inc, 2007 HRTO 34
  • Nova Scotia (Workers Compensation Board) v Martin
  • Nova Scotia (Workers Compensation Board) v Laseur
  • Hydro-Québec v Syndicat des Employées de Techniques Professionnelles et de bureau d’Hydro-Québec, section locale 2000 (SCFP-FTQ), (2008) 2 SCR 561 
  • McGill University Health Centre (Montreal General Hospital) v Syndicat des Employes de l’Hopital General de Montreal, [2007] 2 SCR 561
  • Ramasawaksingh v Brampton (City), 2015 HRTO 1047 (interim decision) 
  • Tombs v 1303939 Ontario LTD (cob Holiday Inn Express), 2015 HRTO 842 
  • Alberta (Human Rights and Citizenship Commission) v Kellogg Brown & Root (Canada) Company, 2007 ABCA 426
  • Entrop v Imperial Oil Limited, 2000 CanLII 16800 (ON CA)
  • Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, Local 30 v Irving Pulp & Paper, Ltd, 2013 SCC 34
  • Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Vogue Shoes (1991), 14 CHRR D/425
  • Ball v Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2010 HRTO 360 (CanLII)
  • Turner v Canada Border Services Agency, 2014 CHRT 10 (CanLII)
  • Rutledge v Fitness One Peter Inc., [2010] OHRTD No 2041, 2010 HRTO 2039
  • Central Alberta Dairy Pool v. Alberta (Human Rights Commission), [1990] 2 SCR 489
  • Barton v Loft Community Centre, 2009 HRTO 647 
  • Gibson v Ridgeview Restaurant Limited, 2013 HRTO 1163
  • Arends v Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 2012 HRTO 1574 (CanLII)
  • Local 41-0 v Nestle Purina Petcare, 2012 CanLII 65216
  • Arumugam v Venture Industrial Supplies Inc., 2013 HRTO 1776
  • Darvish-Ghaderi v Evertz Microsystems, 2013 HRTO 653
  • Rodgers v SCM Supply Chain Management, 2010 HRTO 653 (CanLII)
  • Tiano v Toronto (City), 2014 HRTO 1187 (CanLII)
  • Canada (Attorney General) v Cruden, 2013 CF 520
  • Emergency Health Services Commission v Cassidy, 2011 BCSC 1003 (CanLII)
  • Mackenzie v. Jace Holdings and another (No. 4), 2012 BCHRT 376
  • Central Okanagan School District No 23 v Renaud [1992] 2 SCR 970
  • Holmes v Canada (Attorney General), 1997 CanLII 5101 (FC)
  • Yeats v Commissionaires Great Lakes, 2010 HRTO 906 (CanLII)
  • Morris v British Columbia Railway Co. (2003) 46 CHRR D/162, 2003 BCHRT 14
  • Dawson v Canada Post Corp., 2008 CHRT 41 (CanLII)
  • Carter v Chrysler Canada Inc., 2014 HRTO 845
  • Bubb-Clarke v Toronto Transit Commission, 2002 CanLII 46503 HRTO

Articles